Press freedom as a score — and what it means for you on the ground
Last updated:
Reporters Without Borders publishes an annual press freedom index. In the EU comparison, Scandinavia, the Netherlands, and Germany are far ahead, while Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria lag significantly behind. But how does this translate into the everyday life of a migrant who stays politically informed, discusses politics at the café table, or posts pictures of a demonstration? Here are two sides of the story.
Please note that some texts have been automatically translated from other languages. We review these translations, but cannot guarantee absolute accuracy or perfect style in every language.
What the RSF score really measures
The World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders is the most well-known attempt to quantify press freedom. It combines five dimensions:
- Political independence of the media
- Economic situation of media houses (concentration, state advertising dependence)
- Legal framework (press laws, defamation rules, source protection)
- Social conditions (social climate, self-censorship, hate, and threats)
- Security situation for journalists (physical attacks, arrests, murder)
Each country receives a 0–100 score; the higher, the better. Ranking 2024 (EU-relevant):
- Top of the EU: Norway (~91), Denmark (~89), Sweden (~88), Netherlands (~87), Finland (~86)
- Mid-high: Germany (~84), France (~78), Belgium (~80), Spain (~78)
- Mid: Poland (~71, trend reversing after restoration of press freedom 2024), Italy (~70)
- Mid-low: Hungary (~65), Romania (~65), Bulgaria (~62)
- Poor: Greece (~57)
What the score measures is not primarily your everyday life as a migrant. It measures how safely journalists can do their work, how independent major media houses are, and whether there is political influence on public broadcasting.
How this affects your daily life — the data side
In countries with a high RSF score, you experience some things as a migrant that you would less expect in countries with a low score:
- Plural media landscape: You find various daily newspapers with different political lines, without one dominating the market. Investigative journalism exists both in public broadcasting and independent online media.
- Critical public broadcasting: BBC, ARD, NPO, France Télévisions regularly criticize the respective government in power. Even in countries with a lower score, this exists (Italy, Spain), but the tendency toward self-censorship is measurable there.
- Protection of sources and whistleblowers: Journalistic sources are legally better protected; whistleblowers have their own protection laws in some countries.
- Research on migration topics is more likely to be protected. For example, if you report to a journalist about your own experience with the immigration office, you risk fewer repercussions in a highly rated country.
In low-scoring countries, you more frequently experience:
- Concentrated market with few large houses, often government-affiliated
- Restraint of public broadcasters on critical topics
- Criminally prosecuted defamation with a high threshold if you criticize an official
- Pressure on NGOs and online platforms
What the score doesn’t show — the everyday side
However, press freedom is a structural variable, not a direct everyday indicator. Three aspects where life experience looks different than the score suggests:
- The internet remains open. In all 27 EU states, you have access to international news sources as a migrant. BBC, Al Jazeera, Le Monde, NYT, your home press — all accessible. The RSF score refers to the national media system, not your smartphone.
- Personal freedom of opinion is broader than press freedom. Even in countries with a lower score, you can make political jokes about the government at the café table — the threshold for prosecution of the average citizen is much higher than for journalists. What is restricted are systematic investigations, not private conversations.
- Freedom of assembly can be restricted differently. If you want to participate in a Pride demo in Hungary, you will experience different bureaucratic hurdles than in Germany — but this has little to do with press freedom and more with assembly law and police. Both axes can diverge.
Concrete consequences for your behavior
Three practical points that may be relevant to you as a migrant in the respective country:
What you should read
In every destination country, it pays off to:
- A central, qualitatively reliable daily newspaper with an online edition — Spain’s El País or El Mundo, Germany’s Süddeutsche or FAZ, Italy’s La Repubblica or Corriere, Poland’s Wyborcza, France’s Le Monde or Libération
- A critical public broadcaster for background programs — even if your language level isn’t there yet, subtitles in streaming are usually available
- An English-language outside perspective on the country — Politico Europe, EU Observer, Euractiv, The Guardian (for UK perspective on EU countries)
- Local news for your city — the university district newspaper or NGO newsletters often tell you more about your neighborhood than national media
What you should do sparingly
In countries with a lower RSF score (or specifically restricted freedom of assembly), it is wise to be more cautious with political activities than in Berlin or Amsterdam:
- Participation in demonstrations: first find out if the assembly is registered and what legal consequences participation can have
- Posts and pictures with demo references: in some countries, such posts are documented; in individual cases, this can have consequences for your residence status (even if this is rare and not systematic)
- Political club membership: usually unproblematic, but occasionally asked about during visa renewal
These tips are not a call for self-censorship. They are a reminder that civil rights for third-country nationals mean something different in every country than for locals — and that the consequences of a political action can lie in the residence procedure.
What you should not do less of
What works in every EU capital, regardless of the RSF score:
- Stay politically informed and form your own opinions privately
- Organize unionally (EU law protects workers' rights regardless of the RSF index)
- Discuss wage conditions with colleagues
- Engage in NGOs
What the history of recent years teaches
Press freedom is not a constant. Poland experienced a significant decline between 2015 and 2023, Hungary since 2010, and Slovakia has recently shown a downward trend. On the other hand, Poland has seen a measurable increase since the government change in 2023, showing that structural situations are reversible.
If you want to live in a country for 5 or 10 years, you should not only look at the current value but also the trend. On the country detail pages of vamosa, you will find the RSF score over the last 5–10 years so that you see trends, not just snapshots.
vamosa shows you the RSF score per country with a trend over several years. What a specific editorial line of your favorite newspaper tells you, you can only find out by reading it yourself. We do not provide political advice — and no recommendations on what you should or should not say in a specific country. On the country detail pages, you will find references to media monitoring centers and advisory centers for press freedom.